Skip to main content.

Half Done

Aristotle once said,

"Well begun is half done."

Friend, let me ask, how has your year been thus far? Has it been a good January thru June? Has it been productive? Have you grown in faith? Are you doing more for the Lord now than you were then? Do you care more now for your brethren than you did half a year ago? Is your knowledge of the Bible greater now than it was in January? If it's been a good beginning, wonderful. You're only half done!!

Today is the 26th Sunday of 2008. Half of the opportunities to meet with God's people on the first day of the week through this year are gone. Did you take advantage of them? Were you present with the saints as much as possible, and seeking to elevate their faith and magnify the name of God? If yes, wonderful! But you're only half done.

Half of the opportunities to faithfully return unto the Lord a portion of what He has and will bless us with through this year are gone. Have you made good use of these opportunities? Have your giving habits been a help to the Lord's work? If yes, wonderful! But you're only half done.

Half of the year is gone, and thus half of the time in 2008 which is available for us to share the gospel message with those who do not know the Lord. Have you made a good effort to share the message? Indeed, the Lord's will is for us to share the message of salvation with others, that all might come to faith and obedience. If you've shared your faith with folks you've met, wonderful! But we're only half done.

“...you're only half done.”

Half done. Things that are half done need to be completed. A car repair that is only half done leaves us with a car that won't go. A school examination that is only half done leaves us with no hope of a passing grade. A chicken that is only half done is a sure way to get salmonella. Anything that is only half done, is one half short.

Friend, let's enter the second half of 2008 with a focus to do all that we are able to for the Lord.

2008 is half over. If it's been a good first six months, great!!! Let's make the last six even better. If the first six months have not been so good, if we've not done as we should, then let's repent, pick ourselves up, and get busy in the latter half.

NOTE - I don't know whether we'll have the rest of 2008 or not. If the Lord gives it to us, then we will. If not, then no. Life doesn't come in six month blocks - it comes in single days, hours, minutes, seconds. Determine to be faithful in this moment, and proceed from there. A faithful year of service to the Lord is comprised of 365 faithful days. Let us be focused on today.

We then, as workers together with Him also plead with you not to receive the grace of God in vain. For He says: 'In an acceptable time I have heard you, and in the day of salvation I have helped you.' Behold, now is the accepted time; behold now is the day of salvation. (2 Corinthians 6:1-2)





Article Navigation:
06.22.2008 | Get Wisdom!

Answering The Atheist

The Atheist's Complaint:
Who was Korah's father? Genesis 36:14 says that Esau was his father, but Genesis 36:15-16 says that Eliphaz was his father. Is there a contradiction?

Response:
I'm curious, is it not possible for people within the same family tree to share names? If I'm not mistaken, that is a fairly common practice, even amogn folks today.

So, who was Korah's father? Depends which Korah you're asking about. In Genesis 36:14, we read about some of the sons of Esau. Among them, was a son named Korah. It is obvious that this is a child of Esau, as we read, "...these were the sons of Aholibamah, Esau's wife... And she bore to Esau..."

Then, as we move on to verses 15-16, we read, "...The sons of Eliphaz, the firstborn son of Esau, were...", and then Korah is listed in verse 16. it is obvious that this Korah is not the same one identified in verse 14 as Esau's son, for the text here clearly tells us that this Korah is the son of Eliphaz.

What is the end result? We have a boy named Korah, who was possibly named after his uncle, Korah. If we can do it with John or Michael today, then surely they could do so with Korah (or any other name) back then.

There is no contradiction.


This article is in response to Skeptic's Annotated Bible.